California Agriculture
California Agriculture
California Agriculture
University of California
California Agriculture

Archive

Methods of estimating: Clean fleece production

Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article
Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article

Authors

G. M. Spurlock, University of California
Stanley P. Davis, Department of Animal Husbandry
G. E. Bradford, University of California

Publication Information

California Agriculture 16(5):12-13.

Published May 01, 1962

PDF  |  Citation  |  Permissions

Author Affiliations show

Abstract

The squeeze machine method as evaluated for use on California and Texas wools, while not as accurate as the side sample method, is much easier, quicker, and less expensive. The animals can be rated in order of clean wool production more accurately than by grease weight, for high-shrinking wools. Rating of animals in this manner allows the breeder to choose those of higher productivity. The side sample method in most cases cannot be used by untrained personnel while the squeeze machine can. In high rainfall areas and with breeding stock producing high-yielding fleeces, grease fleece weight may equal or surpass the squeeze machine in accuracy. The machine does not appear to be of sufficient accuracy to determine shrinkage of wools for sales purposes.

Full text

Full text is available in PDF.

Methods of estimating: Clean fleece production

G. M. Spurlock, Stanley P. Davis, G. E. Bradford
Webmaster Email: wsuckow@ucanr.edu

Methods of estimating: Clean fleece production

Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article
Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article

Authors

G. M. Spurlock, University of California
Stanley P. Davis, Department of Animal Husbandry
G. E. Bradford, University of California

Publication Information

California Agriculture 16(5):12-13.

Published May 01, 1962

PDF  |  Citation  |  Permissions

Author Affiliations show

Abstract

The squeeze machine method as evaluated for use on California and Texas wools, while not as accurate as the side sample method, is much easier, quicker, and less expensive. The animals can be rated in order of clean wool production more accurately than by grease weight, for high-shrinking wools. Rating of animals in this manner allows the breeder to choose those of higher productivity. The side sample method in most cases cannot be used by untrained personnel while the squeeze machine can. In high rainfall areas and with breeding stock producing high-yielding fleeces, grease fleece weight may equal or surpass the squeeze machine in accuracy. The machine does not appear to be of sufficient accuracy to determine shrinkage of wools for sales purposes.

Full text

Full text is available in PDF.

University of California, 2801 Second Street, Room 184, Davis, CA, 95618
Email: calag@ucanr.edu | Phone: (530) 750-1223 | Fax: (510) 665-3427
Website: http://calag.ucanr.edu