California Agriculture
California Agriculture
California Agriculture
University of California
California Agriculture

Archive

Baled vs. cubed alfalfa hay, for ewes and lambs

Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article
Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article

Authors

Monte Bell, University of California

Publication Information

California Agriculture 21(11):2-3.

Published November 01, 1967

PDF  |  Citation  |  Permissions

Author Affiliations show

Abstract

Ewes and lambs fed cubed alfalfa wasted 10.5% less hay and gained 6.4 Ibs more per pair than those fed an equal amount and quality of baled hay, in this 44-day test—resulting in a $3.05-per-ton feed value advantage for the cubes.

Full text

Full text is available in PDF.

Author notes

Cooperators and contributors to this study include George Carter, Jr., and Jerry Richardson, M. & T. Corporation, Chico; G. M. Spurlock, J. B. Dobie, R. G. Curley, and P. S. Parsons, University of California, Davis; and the University of California Agricultural Extension Service laboratory at Davis where the chemical analyses of the samples were conducted.

Baled vs. cubed alfalfa hay, for ewes and lambs

Monte Bell
Webmaster Email: wsuckow@ucanr.edu

Baled vs. cubed alfalfa hay, for ewes and lambs

Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article
Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article

Authors

Monte Bell, University of California

Publication Information

California Agriculture 21(11):2-3.

Published November 01, 1967

PDF  |  Citation  |  Permissions

Author Affiliations show

Abstract

Ewes and lambs fed cubed alfalfa wasted 10.5% less hay and gained 6.4 Ibs more per pair than those fed an equal amount and quality of baled hay, in this 44-day test—resulting in a $3.05-per-ton feed value advantage for the cubes.

Full text

Full text is available in PDF.

Author notes

Cooperators and contributors to this study include George Carter, Jr., and Jerry Richardson, M. & T. Corporation, Chico; G. M. Spurlock, J. B. Dobie, R. G. Curley, and P. S. Parsons, University of California, Davis; and the University of California Agricultural Extension Service laboratory at Davis where the chemical analyses of the samples were conducted.


University of California, 2801 Second Street, Room 184, Davis, CA, 95618
Email: calag@ucanr.edu | Phone: (530) 750-1223 | Fax: (510) 665-3427
Website: https://calag.ucanr.edu