Menu California Agriculture
California Agriculture
California Agriculture
California Agriculture
University of California
California Agriculture

All Issues

The economics of IPM in processing tomatoes

California Agriculture > Volume 40 > Number 3  > research article 

< Previous | Table of Contents  

< Previous | Table of Contents  

Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article
Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article

Authors

John M. Antle, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Davis
Seong K. Park, Korea Rural Economics Institute, Seoul, Korea

Publication Information

California Agriculture 40(3):31-32.

Published March 01, 1986

PDF  |  Citation  |  Permissions

Author Affiliations show

Abstract

Even without considering risk reduction, which is significant, the benefits of IPM outweigh the costs.

Full text

Full text is available in PDF.

Author notes

The authors gratefully acknowledge the advice and assistance of Gene Miyao, Farm Advisor, Yolo County; Craig Weakley, Area Farm Advisor, Sutter-Yuba Counties; Mary Louise Flint, Director, IPM Manuals Group, UC Davis; Karen Klonsky, Farm Management Extension Specialist, UC Davis; and Frank Zalom, IPM Extension Specialist, UC Davis. The authors also thank the 35 Sacramento Valley tomato growers who provided the information on which this study was based.

The economics of IPM in processing tomatoes

John M. Antle, Seong K. Park
University
of
California
Division of Agriculture
and
Natural Resources
Site Information Get PDF Reader
sbnum=9680 | pagenum=52363
© 2024 Regents of the University of California Nondiscrimination Statement Accessibility
Webmaster Email: sjosterman@ucanr.edu

The economics of IPM in processing tomatoes

California Agriculture > Volume 40 > Number 3  > research article 

< Previous | Table of Contents  

< Previous | Table of Contents  

Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article
Share using any of the popular social networks Share by sending an email Print article

Authors

John M. Antle, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of California, Davis
Seong K. Park, Korea Rural Economics Institute, Seoul, Korea

Publication Information

California Agriculture 40(3):31-32.

Published March 01, 1986

PDF  |  Citation  |  Permissions

Author Affiliations show

Abstract

Even without considering risk reduction, which is significant, the benefits of IPM outweigh the costs.

Full text

Full text is available in PDF.

Author notes

The authors gratefully acknowledge the advice and assistance of Gene Miyao, Farm Advisor, Yolo County; Craig Weakley, Area Farm Advisor, Sutter-Yuba Counties; Mary Louise Flint, Director, IPM Manuals Group, UC Davis; Karen Klonsky, Farm Management Extension Specialist, UC Davis; and Frank Zalom, IPM Extension Specialist, UC Davis. The authors also thank the 35 Sacramento Valley tomato growers who provided the information on which this study was based.

University of California, 2801 Second Street, Room 184, Davis, CA, 95618
Email: calag@ucanr.edu | Phone: (530) 750-1223 | Fax: (510) 665-3427
Website: https://calag.ucanr.edu